FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
+21
Vivienne Westwood
Prada
Bulgari
Burberry
Hermès
Armani
Miu Miu
Versace
Tiffany
Yves Saint Laurent
Jimmy Choo
Dior
Alexander McQueen
Ray-Ban
Zara
Valentino
Chanel
Marchesa
Givenchy
Gucci
Lucifer
25 posters
PO Anonymous Mafia :: Set 2 :: Games
Page 13 of 40
Page 13 of 40 • 1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 26 ... 40
FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
First topic message reminder :
Players Alive: Alexander McQueen, Armani, Bulgari, Burberry, Chanel, Fendi, Givenchy, Gucci, Jimmy Choo, Louis Vuitton, Marchesa, Prada, Ray-Ban, Valentino, Vera Wang, Versace, Vivienne Westwood, Yves Saint Laurent, Zara
Players Dead: Miu Miu, Dior, Kate Spade, Hermès, Tiffany
Votecounts: Lucifer's ISO
Replacements: Louis Vuitton, Kate Spade, Hermès, Givenchy, Armani, Vivienne Westwood
Things To Note:
Players Alive: Alexander McQueen, Armani, Bulgari, Burberry, Chanel, Fendi, Givenchy, Gucci, Jimmy Choo, Louis Vuitton, Marchesa, Prada, Ray-Ban, Valentino, Vera Wang, Versace, Vivienne Westwood, Yves Saint Laurent, Zara
Players Dead: Miu Miu, Dior, Kate Spade, Hermès, Tiffany
Votecounts: Lucifer's ISO
Replacements: Louis Vuitton, Kate Spade, Hermès, Givenchy, Armani, Vivienne Westwood
Things To Note:
- All roles are variations/modifications of the ones listed here.
- No posts for 48 hours = prodded. 3 prods or no post/response in 24 hours = replaced.
- You can see if a player is online with a small blue box in the top right corner of their posts (if they have not hidden their online status).
- Players may only request one deadline extension per game if 25% of the players (rounded up) post in thread asking for one, bolded for me to see.
- This game uses the following Night Action Resolution, or "priority". Simultaneous actions will both occur, and actions that combine these use the first priority:
- Spoiler:
- Copy
Commute
Hide
Redirection
Roleblock/stop
Jailkeep
Miscellaneous
Protect
Kill
Doctor
Result-Based Actions
Non-Kill Death
Last edited by Lucifer on Sun Feb 16, 2014 10:48 pm; edited 58 times in total
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
[[ VOTECOUNT 1.11 ]]
Selections from Ziad Nakad, Summer 2013.
Hermès (5) - Prada, Tiffany, Valentino, Yves Saint Laurent, Vera Wang
Miu Miu (3) - Burberry, Vivienne Westwood, Dior
Prada (2) - Versace
Tiffany (2) - Bulgari, Fendi
Armani (1) - Chanel
Bulgari (1) - Jimmy Choo
Gucci (1) - Kate Spade
Jimmy Choo (1) - Ray-Ban
Louis Vuitton (1) - Gucci
Ray-Ban (1) -Louis Vuitton
Valentino (1) - Armani
Vera Wang (1) - Alexander McQueen
Not Voting (5) - Givenchy, Hermès, Marchesa, Miu Miu, Zara
With 24 alive, it takes 13 to lynch.
Deadline is Sun. Jan. 26 @ 20:00 EST, approximately 4.5 days from now.
Zara and Kate Spade have until Thurs. Jan. 23 @ 11:00 EST to post or they will be replaced. More prods coming soon, post and stop lurking to be safe.
Selections from Ziad Nakad, Summer 2013.
Hermès (5) - Prada, Tiffany, Valentino, Yves Saint Laurent, Vera Wang
Miu Miu (3) - Burberry, Vivienne Westwood, Dior
Prada (2) - Versace
Tiffany (2) - Bulgari, Fendi
Armani (1) - Chanel
Bulgari (1) - Jimmy Choo
Gucci (1) - Kate Spade
Jimmy Choo (1) - Ray-Ban
Louis Vuitton (1) - Gucci
Ray-Ban (1) -Louis Vuitton
Valentino (1) - Armani
Vera Wang (1) - Alexander McQueen
Not Voting (5) - Givenchy, Hermès, Marchesa, Miu Miu, Zara
With 24 alive, it takes 13 to lynch.
Deadline is Sun. Jan. 26 @ 20:00 EST, approximately 4.5 days from now.
Zara and Kate Spade have until Thurs. Jan. 23 @ 11:00 EST to post or they will be replaced. More prods coming soon, post and stop lurking to be safe.
Last edited by Lucifer on Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:08 pm; edited 3 times in total
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
can we lynch this?Miu Miu wrote:Ah, I didn't know pressure was more of a towny thing, I always construed it as scummy.
Apologies.
Valentino- Jesus, Take The Wheel
- Posts : 202
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
actually yeah i want to lynch Miu Miu today Hermes can wait tomorrow
vote Miu Miu
vote Miu Miu
Valentino- Jesus, Take The Wheel
- Posts : 202
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
How are we supposed to know who to lynch if it doesn't tell us our team Seb please tell me the mafia.
Fendi- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 44
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Also, I still like my vote on Tiffany, she is only becoming more and more annoying since accumulating votes. I might change later depending on the circumstances.
Fendi- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 44
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Ray-ban I wanted you to post something of some substance not just complain about not knowing how to Iso someone. You also put off Dior's question asking you your opinions on the game so far. So I'll ask it again. What are your opinions on the game so far Ray-ban?
I'm agreeing with Valentino that a Miu Miu vote might be our best course of action at this point. No one has given me overwhelming scum vibes, and even though I think Miu Miu might be just new to mafia, the fact that she has made so many slip ups is just rubbing me the wrong way.
I don't think that Tiffany is a great vote. I would like her to go back and read the first 7 pages as it would be useful, but I think some people are mistaking a weird posting style for scumminess. I have been in multiple games in the past where people used weird posting styles, and as far as I can remember, they almost always flipped Town, so I'm not going to be going after her until I see some real reason to.
I'm leaving my vote on Ray-ban for now, but considering switching it back to Miu Miu.
I'm agreeing with Valentino that a Miu Miu vote might be our best course of action at this point. No one has given me overwhelming scum vibes, and even though I think Miu Miu might be just new to mafia, the fact that she has made so many slip ups is just rubbing me the wrong way.
I don't think that Tiffany is a great vote. I would like her to go back and read the first 7 pages as it would be useful, but I think some people are mistaking a weird posting style for scumminess. I have been in multiple games in the past where people used weird posting styles, and as far as I can remember, they almost always flipped Town, so I'm not going to be going after her until I see some real reason to.
I'm leaving my vote on Ray-ban for now, but considering switching it back to Miu Miu.
Louis Vuitton- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 38
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Well the weird posting styles are clearly post restrictions as the rhyming guy (Names/avatars still aren't meshing in my head) said when he posted 'I'll do ISO when this thing ends", so either it's going to be passed around or they're faking a post restriction (maybe as Marcelo did in BW, but time will tell). I'll do ISO on Miu Miu later/tomorrow, I can't even remember who he is ugh.
Alexander McQueen- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 36
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Or the other possibility is that it was just included as a "do this day 1" in their role PM.
Alexander McQueen- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 36
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Also seb could you potentially link the player's ISO in the top post where it says "players alive". It'd be a huge help actually
Alexander McQueen- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 36
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Alexander McQueen wrote:Also seb could you potentially link the player's ISO in the top post where it says "players alive". It'd be a huge help actually :bounce:
Of COURSE I will, dear! I don't know WHY it didn't occur to me in the FIRST place, thank you!
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
I am just going to confirm I have no post restriction and just feel like talking this way caus’ ma homeboys like it, ya get me?
I was wantin’ da iso as I could’t even tell dat dere’s 5 players, let alone 24.
I’m giving this up for serious posts.
Some thoughts:
Armani: “we waited for specific instances of scummy behavior to occur, and then analyze them,”: Seems like he’s trying for easy lynches rather than actively looking.
Prada doing nothing but wagoning with no reasons is bad.
Louis is weird. @ :Louis why the focous on me rather than other with a lot less activity?
My identity is now obvious. I hate these avatars.
I’m going to look at some of the people on the bigger wagon tomorrow.
I was wantin’ da iso as I could’t even tell dat dere’s 5 players, let alone 24.
I’m giving this up for serious posts.
Some thoughts:
Armani: “we waited for specific instances of scummy behavior to occur, and then analyze them,”: Seems like he’s trying for easy lynches rather than actively looking.
Prada doing nothing but wagoning with no reasons is bad.
Louis is weird. @ :Louis why the focous on me rather than other with a lot less activity?
My identity is now obvious. I hate these avatars.
I’m going to look at some of the people on the bigger wagon tomorrow.
Ray-Ban- The One True Gaga
- Posts : 101
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Alexander McQueen wrote:Well the weird posting styles are clearly post restrictions as the rhyming guy (Names/avatars still aren't meshing in my head) said when he posted 'I'll do ISO when this thing ends", so either it's going to be passed around or they're faking a post restriction (maybe as Marcelo did in BW, but time will tell). I'll do ISO on Miu Miu later/tomorrow, I can't even remember who he is ugh.
I interpreted Vivienne saying that she would do an ISO when she was free in the sense of having available time, not when she was rid of the posting restriction. That isn't to say anyone even has a post restriction in the first place: people are probably just doing this to take advantage of the anonymity.
Jimmy's analysis of Bulgari is going too in-depth but the essence is on target. Asking for explanations for votes without providing explanations for your own is hypocritical and a fair scum-tell.
Burberry- Charlie's Angel
- Posts : 64
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Burberry I think the iso was referring to me like he doesnt see me as town and is promising content
despite having that shitty post format or whatever hes doing he seems to be making decent reads. not a/fan of the versace read in general tho but thats 90% gut
despite having that shitty post format or whatever hes doing he seems to be making decent reads. not a/fan of the versace read in general tho but thats 90% gut
Valentino- Jesus, Take The Wheel
- Posts : 202
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Rayban how is Prada just wagonning when he has first vote on Hermes
the slowness of these wagons is disappointing, the game for a 20+p is pretty slow in general and that's just sad
the slowness of these wagons is disappointing, the game for a 20+p is pretty slow in general and that's just sad
Valentino- Jesus, Take The Wheel
- Posts : 202
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
In regards to the post restrictions I know it's already been somewhat pointed at before but from the opening flavor
And while it's somewhat possible that since the first post Ms. Westwood made was
I really feel like we're focusing the posting styles too much when it's content that actually matters. And while I can understand some of the scum reads on Tiffany for other reasons the idea that we should be voting for someone because they are "annoying" is such a lazy attitude that you might as well have not signed up or are just incredibly dense mafia. (That last part was mostly directed at a certain dead rapper mostly)
Lucifer wrote:
LUCIFER: Ok. Ok. Vivi? Where you BE, gurl?
[VIVIENNE WESTWOOD attempts to respond in rhymes but is promptly cut off.]
And while it's somewhat possible that since the first post Ms. Westwood made was
I really feel like we're focusing the posting styles too much when it's content that actually matters. And while I can understand some of the scum reads on Tiffany for other reasons the idea that we should be voting for someone because they are "annoying" is such a lazy attitude that you might as well have not signed up or are just incredibly dense mafia. (That last part was mostly directed at a certain dead rapper mostly)
Marchesa- The One True Gaga
- Posts : 123
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
I just didn't consider a post restriction.
unvote
unvote
Fendi- Assistant's Assistant
- Posts : 44
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
oh lol I didn't finish my thought
"And while it's somewhat possible that since the first post Ms. Westwood made rhymed, Lucifier just rolled with it and added it to the flavor but it seems far more likely it is in fact a post restriction."
"And while it's somewhat possible that since the first post Ms. Westwood made rhymed, Lucifier just rolled with it and added it to the flavor but it seems far more likely it is in fact a post restriction."
Marchesa- The One True Gaga
- Posts : 123
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Marchesa wrote:In regards to the post restrictions I know it's already been somewhat pointed at before but from the opening flavorLucifer wrote:
LUCIFER: Ok. Ok. Vivi? Where you BE, gurl?
[VIVIENNE WESTWOOD attempts to respond in rhymes but is promptly cut off.]
And while it's somewhat possible that since the first post Ms. Westwood made was
I really feel like we're focusing the posting styles too much when it's content that actually matters. And while I can understand some of the scum reads on Tiffany for other reasons the idea that we should be voting for someone because they are "annoying" is such a lazy attitude that you might as well have not signed up or are just incredibly dense mafia. (That last part was mostly directed at a certain dead rapper mostly)
Fendi wrote:I just didn't consider a post restriction.
unvote
Your vote on Tiffany didn't even make sense in the first place. Tiffany making many unhelpful posts would be a valid reason, but not her posting style. Then when someone confronted you with your dumb reasoning you immediately unvoted. Trying to appease people or what?
Prada- The One True Gaga
- Posts : 90
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
On Armani, the way he defended himself from my accusations gave off a very pro-town vibe imo. He was not very aggressive and provided sound reasoning for why he is not scum (aka the two posts he buddied had no content either). That being said, I'm going to stay null on him until he can provide reads on players which are current.
It's nice to see Versace posting some good content too, explaining his reads like I asked and making his own. Also responding to others calling him out as scum in a cool and collected fashion.
However, onto Miu Miu,
The second part seems like she is trying to give herself an easy exit excuse if Hermes flips town on a lynch (which could happen seeing that she has the most votes), saying "I wasn't adamant :/" and getting towncred if she flips scum - "I called it!". It's a little bit WIFOM, i know, but it seems overcautious in general, which is how she's been playing the whole game.
The real reason I think she's slightly scummy is that despite me asking her to put down a vote and explaining why this is beneficial for town, she still has not put down a vote. Please, give some reads, call out who you think is scum with a little more confidence, and vote.
Also, I agree with others about the overcautiousness stuff. And about how you said pressure = scum previously.
tl;dr - anyone you think is really scummy atm? vote it
unvote
vote Miu Miu
It's nice to see Versace posting some good content too, explaining his reads like I asked and making his own. Also responding to others calling him out as scum in a cool and collected fashion.
However, onto Miu Miu,
First part seems like buddying to me.Miu Miu wrote:I agree w/ Valentino that there have been a lot of sketchy scum-reads from Herm that were just meant to provoke a reaction or were filler / unproductive
Overall, still leaning scum @ Herms, but not adamant.
The second part seems like she is trying to give herself an easy exit excuse if Hermes flips town on a lynch (which could happen seeing that she has the most votes), saying "I wasn't adamant :/" and getting towncred if she flips scum - "I called it!". It's a little bit WIFOM, i know, but it seems overcautious in general, which is how she's been playing the whole game.
The real reason I think she's slightly scummy is that despite me asking her to put down a vote and explaining why this is beneficial for town, she still has not put down a vote. Please, give some reads, call out who you think is scum with a little more confidence, and vote.
Also, I agree with others about the overcautiousness stuff. And about how you said pressure = scum previously.
tl;dr - anyone you think is really scummy atm? vote it
unvote
vote Miu Miu
Chanel- Charlie's Angel
- Posts : 60
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Chanel wrote:Vera Wang wrote:unvote
vote Hermes
hello miss WANG
explain your vote please
I "read" through and thought, "hey, if 3 other people have an idea to vote them, why not go along"
I like riding in wagons with other people
Vera Wang- Venti Frappuccino
- Posts : 24
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Burberry wrote:Jimmy's analysis of Bulgari is going too in-depth but the essence is on target. Asking for explanations for votes without providing explanations for your own is hypocritical and a fair scum-tell.
???
Although Tiffany is still scummy (and it has nothing to do with his posting style), this needs some addressing.
Unvote
Vote Louis Vuittone
I don't see how nobody called this out yet. "I think this person is scummy but I'm going to leave my vote on someone else for no reason" is very rarely town oriented.
Bulgari- Charlie's Angel
- Posts : 59
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Prada, if you're going to call people out for questionable votes then you should explain your vote on Hermes better. As in, more than "careless" and "trying to get a reaction."
Chanel, agreeing with people is not necessarily buddying. A lot of people have agreed with things other people have said, me included, and it's not too much to ask for that people will have the same idea. If you would specify what exactly about Miu Miu's statement would be buddying it would be more helpful.
This is more of a general statement to the whole game that accusations of buddying can be misinterpreted as simply agreeing. Of course if someone is stealing another person's words that is scummy but not all instances are necessarily indicate of mafia.
Vera Wang try developing more of your own thoughts rather than wagoning on others'.
Bulgari, I was referring less to the unvote and more on voting Tiffany. I'm also pretty sure Louis Vuitton has a scumread on Ray-Ban for "going under the radar" as he would put it.
Marchesa, do you believe Tiffany has some kind of post restriction as well, or only Vivienne?
Chanel, agreeing with people is not necessarily buddying. A lot of people have agreed with things other people have said, me included, and it's not too much to ask for that people will have the same idea. If you would specify what exactly about Miu Miu's statement would be buddying it would be more helpful.
This is more of a general statement to the whole game that accusations of buddying can be misinterpreted as simply agreeing. Of course if someone is stealing another person's words that is scummy but not all instances are necessarily indicate of mafia.
Vera Wang try developing more of your own thoughts rather than wagoning on others'.
Bulgari, I was referring less to the unvote and more on voting Tiffany. I'm also pretty sure Louis Vuitton has a scumread on Ray-Ban for "going under the radar" as he would put it.
Marchesa, do you believe Tiffany has some kind of post restriction as well, or only Vivienne?
Burberry- Charlie's Angel
- Posts : 64
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
@Burberry - I admit I may have been using "buddying" too liberally and loosely. However, even if you disregard the part about the buddying, my argument on Miu Miu still stands on its own - specifically about the part where she has not yet cast a vote and appears overly cautious
also: FUCK YEAH FRAPPUCCINOOO~
also: FUCK YEAH FRAPPUCCINOOO~
Chanel- Charlie's Angel
- Posts : 60
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Burberry wrote:Prada, if you're going to call people out for questionable votes then you should explain your vote on Hermes better. As in, more than "careless" and "trying to get a reaction."
Chanel, agreeing with people is not necessarily buddying. A lot of people have agreed with things other people have said, me included, and it's not too much to ask for that people will have the same idea. If you would specify what exactly about Miu Miu's statement would be buddying it would be more helpful.
This is more of a general statement to the whole game that accusations of buddying can be misinterpreted as simply agreeing. Of course if someone is stealing another person's words that is scummy but not all instances are necessarily indicate of mafia.
Vera Wang try developing more of your own thoughts rather than wagoning on others'.
Bulgari, I was referring less to the unvote and more on voting Tiffany. I'm also pretty sure Louis Vuitton has a scumread on Ray-Ban for "going under the radar" as he would put it.
Marchesa, do you believe Tiffany has some kind of post restriction as well, or only Vivienne?
That's going to take a day or so, my brain is still fried from exams
Vera Wang- Venti Frappuccino
- Posts : 24
Re: FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1
Honestly, I was just bored with the Dior vote.
Prada- The One True Gaga
- Posts : 90
Page 13 of 40 • 1 ... 8 ... 12, 13, 14 ... 26 ... 40
Similar topics
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 5
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 6 - Sun. Mar. 9 @ 2:00 EST
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 7
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 3.2-3.9
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 4
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 6 - Sun. Mar. 9 @ 2:00 EST
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 7
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 3.2-3.9
» FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Day 4
PO Anonymous Mafia :: Set 2 :: Games
Page 13 of 40
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|