Current date/time is Fri Jun 05, 2020 9:25 am
Search found 36 matches for Alexander McQueen
I don't like how Tiffanny is trying to destroy the level of seriousness we had already reached at all though.
Vera Wang wrote:unvote
I don't think enough people took notion of this. This is her only actual post in the game, and the only thing she did was to get on a wagon without any motive whatsoever.
vote vera wang
These post restrictions are really annoying ugh.
vote miu miu
There's some interesting ones too though. Let me start off with this one. I'll put the quotes I'm talking about to make this not too bad to wade through.
This is the first instance of her buddying with Prada, which has been a constant throughout the day. Calling Prada "strong town" when they didn't contribute a whole lot (do the ISO yourself, you won't find anything really sticking out) is very suspicious. When Valentino calls her out on that shortly after that, she also responds in an odd manner. While it may not be necessarily something to go off, it's interesting to see her get into an argument with Dior, who flipped town this night (but more on that later) These are her odd responses:
She definitely keeps up with the buddying, even claiming to not understand what's scummy about it. Only after the first post she apparently decides to do an ISO of Prada, and that really forces her to take a different stance on him. She still sticks with him, but she also really wants to avoid any confrontation which is pretty indicative of scum as well. The buddying continues till now, so if one of them is lynched and flips scum, odds are very high the other one is scum too.
Beautiful OMGUS, that's really all I have to say about that. She also did this when she was arguing with Bulgari during day 1, which makes a smooth transition to the other get from this post: the huge 360° on Bulgari.
There's more stuff like refusing to answer the question whether her weird posting style is an actual post restriction, not calling vera wang scummy which is kinda odd considering her weird posts that one night (due to "hormone imbalance") and well just generally the huge amount of contentless posts which only use I can think of is killing discussion.
also to answer valentino's question: buddying isn't always a scum tell, but when tiffany basically called something "heavy town" who hadn't even made a single serious post, which definitely IS a scumtell in my book.
also there's other tells such as the weird call on vera wang, and well also the night action. dior looked very much town and he was also after tiffany reading them as scum on multiple occasions. framing is always an option, but i think it's more likely tiffany and her scumbuddy/ies is/are behind this.
well i see prada as null too, so if he'd start posting or if we lynch tiffany we should be able to figure out his allignment rather easily.
Louis Vuitton wrote:Ray-Ban wrote:“He could be serious, but then he doesn't follow up on it later so I don't think that's feasible...?”
I was doing that early as I didn’t really have any reads at that point so felt like trying to pressure someone. When I had a better idea I picked someone else to vote.
I will look for reasons they're scum later.
So you are just voting them without having any reasons why they are scum...
Louis Vuitton wrote:Vote Armani
Isn't that exacly what you did too???
As to answer your question, I don't think posting huge walls of text is necessarily indicative of either side, especially in an anon game. It's really something that depends on the meta of the person you're talking about.
on an actually related note, i for one kinda believe ray-ban's claim. doing an iso on him didn't really bring up anything big except for the "i'll look for reasons why they're scum later". i don't really know what to make of that myself though. on the other hand reporter is a really weird role to claim like i didn't even know something like that existed. being bulletproof as the rock would make /some/ sense flavor wise as well but i doubt that's something seb would keep in mind while coming up with roles.
i still think tiffany is scum, but i wouldn't be completely opposed to a vera wang/yves lynch or the one who didn't contribute anything whatsoever yet and got all defensive about it (i can't recall his name and i gtg now so yeaaaah).
Miu Miu (13) - Burberry, Vivienne Westwood,
DAY 3 LYNCH
Louis Vuitton (10) - Versace, Vera Wang, Yves Saint Laurent, Jimmy Choo, Prada, Burberry,
ok just gonna leave this here
- valentino is town (mafia sensor doesn't even make sense)
- jimmy choo, yves saint laurent and vera wang are the neighbors (posting this here mainly because i forgot all the time)
so off the first list this leaves burberry and ray-ban as my best picks to be scum, while on the second wagon versace/prada/burberry and ray-ban again (assuming neighbors are all town.
i have a couple of questions though
- what's the most likely scenario involving only one kill a night but also crossfire like we had here? i'm kinda confused.
- where did you get this from Ray-Ban: "Of the neighbouts: The traitor attacked jimmy so if they knew the scum jimmy probs isn't scum."