Current date/time is Fri Jun 05, 2020 11:01 am
Search found 56 matches for Armani
@Jimmy: All I got from RVS is that that Vivienne chick is really into poetry, and this post (like the others have mentioned) is slightly scummy.
Chanel, I seem to have fallen under the radar, but honey, I'm back. So, the posts you're referring to are still pretty early in the game, and I honestly didn't get a lot of insight from RVS. That one post by Valentino really did bug me though, and when something bugs me, it bugs me. Dior and Hermès had mentioned his post too, but, I don't think agreeing with somebody is exactly buddying them? I could be wrong.
Also, I seem to be missing something: Does it matter that I've said other people have mentioned that post as well? I'm just agreeing with someone, not hiding behind their back.
also @Armani, the way I see it, the comment about you admitting that people mentioned the valentino thingy before shows that you know you are following the posts of other people, you know what content they have posted to support their argument
What content. These are the two posts that have mentioned how scummy Valentino's post was: here and here.
Dior wrote:No Valentino, early wagons are not good.
Hermès wrote:SORRY I LOVE YOUR MUSIC BUT YOUR COMMENT ABOUT EARLY WAGGONS SOUNDED SORT OF SCUMMY JS.
What sort of reasoning/content could I have drawn from these two posts, exactly?
I hyperlinked Valentino's post in what you quoted, but here it is in all it's glory: https://koalas.forumotion.com/t2p50-fashionable-noc-anon-mafia-day-1-sun-jan-26-2000-est#67
Anyway, if Chanel is finished, I think I'm going back to reading your posts, ladies
Louis Vuitton wrote:No, I posted my read on Armani and said why I thought he was scummy. "Armani(scummy): I don't like how he has only focused on one post by Valentino in RVS. I get that the post is slightly scummy, but he has not developed his argument at all and all his posts are just rehashes of his original argument. Also once Chanel says that she likes the way he responded to her accusations Armani drops completely off the map. I don't like that at all." What Ray-ban is doing is completely different. He is posting a vote on someone and then going back and rereading posts specifically looking for things that can justify the vote after the fact. This is much worse than looking at someone with an objective viewpoint and once you finish analyzing everything, coming to the conclusion that they are scummy. If you do the former you are bound to find stuff to support your predetermined conclusion, and it's a backwards way to scum hunt that doesn't produce organic results.
I've been having trouble accessing this forum, so that's why I've been so inactive, sweetie. Also, I was only focusing on that old-ass post because that's what Chanel kept on focusing on for her argument against me.
I had some strange ability where I chose someone to protect for the whole game. The person I chose was Hermes.
People who ruin gambits are dumb. Let them run their course. I really want to hammer right now but alas I won't.
vote: Jimmy Choo
First his name has Choo in it which is begging for a train of votes. Just saying.
Second, coming in here and attacking the new guy. How does my post seem even remotely scummy? I answered the question that was presented to me and I admitted to being a PR at one point. Tell me why I would not have just said no and lied about it if I were scum.
2. I was vanillaized. After reading stuff I dont' convert to vanilla after using my role so yeah. Also, 99% sure that means my protect on Hermes stopped when I was vanillaized.
3. I am still confused at the game.
vote: Jimmy Choo
Question for anyone saying I’m scum for lynching louis, my top scumread and having them flipped scum- would YOU like to be lynched tommorow just because you voted me wrongly?
Oh, you are so much appealing to my emotions right now. What ever should I do?