Current date/time is Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:33 am
Search found 28 matches for Miu Miu
I have some work to attend to, but I will read more in depth later and hopefully post my insights.
Sorry for the delay
I know, I know, I know - this is all over-cautious and my blatant conservatism is arguably an overreaction and could give you guys the wrong idea on who I am, but I do it at the best interest of the towns' prosperity.
Moreover, I stand by my initial anti-wagon knee-jerk reaction to the vote count I saw as I wasn't fully informed of the contents of the thread at that point due to my busy schedule. Now, I have caught-up a bit and read a fair amount. Needless to say, some people are overthinking the value of minuscule detailed, especially at this point, in my opinions. I advise a more lax analysis of players and such in a game of this quantity and set-up, but you can differentiate in beliefs if you wish. Regardless of personal philosophy, I will remain voteless for now, but keep my eye on the following individuals: Hermés and Versace.
That is all.
Heremés has just been voting around and trying to hear everyone's reads and start a potential wagon as of late. Might just be an aggressive town, but could be a scum trying to screw with everyone.
Versace is a very weak, weak read that is based solely off f inactivity and probably won't amount to much in the long run.
Bulgari wrote:The effort is what makes me feel that he's not scum.
This is BS, about herm - effort shouldn't correlate to a read unless you know their meta (and this is anon + only d1.)
I agree w/ Valentino that there have been a lot of sketchy scum-reads from Herm that were just meant to provoke a reaction or were filler / unproductive
Overall, still leaning scum @ Herms, but not adamant.
Valentino wrote:Miu Miu wrote:Ah, I didn't know pressure was more of a towny thing, I always construed it as scummy.
can we lynch this?
I mean, if you want to start a random wagon, go ahead. I will leave my thoughts on what is wrong with this specific wagon in the suceeding posts, so stay tuned.
Louis Vuitton wrote:I'm agreeing with Valentino that a Miu Miu vote might be our best course of action at this point. No one has given me overwhelming scum vibes, and even though I think Miu Miu might be just new to mafia, the fact that she has made so many slip ups is just rubbing me the wrong way.
Apparently being unknowledgeable on one occurance is "many slip ups", ok. As for anything else that could possibly be a "slip up", my initial conservative nature is just how I have developed as a player over the course of the few games I have played, nothing wrong with that early-game unless you are really digging-deep to try and frame someone for the sake of doing so, not for the sake of finding scum.
I don't think that Tiffany is a great vote. I would like her to go back and read the first 7 pages as it would be useful, but I think some people are mistaking a weird posting style for scumminess. I have been in multiple games in the past where people used weird posting styles, and as far as I can remember, they almost always flipped Town, so I'm not going to be going after her until I see some real reason to.
Yes, well put. Her third person (or is that second person, idek) posting is kind of strange, but it shouldn't be a scum tell, or a town tell - it is indicative of nothing. Tiffany is giving me a pretty decent bull, leaning town, currently.
Also, Prada, careless is hardly an argument. RVS is kind dead at this point and throwing a vote on me because I am "careless" is really shitty reasoning. I actually have not been careless at all. My vote on Valentino is justified.
I dislike her getting ultra-defensive and serious after being lax and humorous in the preceding posts Herms made. In addition, the justification on the Valentino vote was weak. Overall, the over-defensiveness of this reaction and exaggeration of details to benefit themselves gives me a scummy vibe.
I AM INTERESTED TO SEE THIS SLIP. IS IT A SLIPPERY SLIDE. MILEY LIKES SLIDES. I HOPE IT IS A WATERSLIDE.
ALSO WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE "WHY NOT?" WHEN YOU ASKED KRISTEN FUCKER (insulting actress not player) IF SHE THINKS I AM TOWN OR NOT?
So after being serious upon initial accusations of her misplaying / first votes on her, Herm proceeds to act all funny and spam caps and such, as you can see. (She also did this in numerous earlier posts, but they aren't too important as many were too early or RVS).
I find this 180 interesting, but not necessarily indicative of scummy behavior. Will keep an eye on this and see if it gets excessive. PS: Avoiding serious accusations and valid points is kind of scummy, but being as this post is so irrelevant, I won't hold it against you.
Reads are one thing, saying conf town (and then contradicting yourself by saying it's 70% accurate???) is another. I'm far from stupid. Douchey town is a shitty playstyle so let's just refrain from insulting and being asses please. Don't be a TIWSS.
Sasha Obama hi how r u gurl. How u doin. U r a qt.
This is a semi-180, once more. Although you weren't being formal by any stretch in the first segment of this post, you were being serious and actually wanted to get a point and constructively criticize a read in it. Then, you 180 in the last line about Sasha. This all could be a large nitpick of mine and I am unsure of what it amounts to, but the 180s are either a playstyle habit of yours, or something is up.
There are numerous instances of this, but I will stop here. Check all of their posts and see yourself, if you'd like.
How the hell is getting reads from people scummy. Reads are so vital. When scum is lynched, their reads can be examined along with their interactions to find partners, never mind that it stimulates discussion and progresses the game. Vote on Kristin was RVS, no need to justify that. Vote on Valentino was justified. Wanted to put a bit of pressure on her after that post about wanting an early bandwagon, and her response hasn't given me a strong read either way. Vote on Drake (fuck the fashion aliases) is completely legit. He practically claimed scum. I'm not "trying to start a potential wagon" to screw with people, I'm placing my vote on a scumread. The argument "could be scum trying to screw with everyone" could literally be applied to every single person playing. It's completely arbitrary.
So defensive and supportive of own plays. Another blatant overreaction and now she's using her own, biased, logic to support her own plays throughout the game. If you are that insecure and feel it is a necessity to back-up everything you say, you are either over-cautious or scum. The former would make no sense from you as you called me out for being over-cautious, when I openly claimed to be, and stated that it was a bad mentality. I am assuming you aren't contradicting yourself, thus giving me a legitimately strong scum read on you.
As bad as your reasoning on me is, you haven't backed it up with a vote. Disappointing. We aren't going to get anywhere with BS reasoning and no voting.
Want a vote? Here:
Givenchy wrote:Givenchy still has no idea what is happening.
Vote Kate Spade
Givenchy does not like that name.
At this point, that isn't even funny.
Read the damn thread, wouldn't you!?
I can assume you are newer and cut you some slack, but I wouldn't advise saying publicly that you are clueless and RVSing at this point. You are just hurting yourself in the long run
Tiffany wrote:Tiffany agrees with Burberry. However, Tiffany would rather vote Miu Miu instead of Prada, as Prada is possibly inactive while Miu Miu is actually has definite foolish posts. What Tiffany means to say is: the scum posts : total posts ratio of Prada is way less than of Miu Miu.
Tiffany still has her vote on Bulgari as Tiffany believes her to be highest probability of scum!
I literally have one "foolish" post.
As for "scum posts", you can construe that as you wish and you're entitled to do so. However, I'd like a few examples that make this "scum post ratio" so inflated, if you will.
Kate Spade wrote:rofl miu miu stop making it obvious who you are, it makes it ez to read your meta and compare with othe rgames
vote miu miu
Once the mislynch goes through, town might want to put some thought into Tiffany. Heremès has seemed a lot less scummy after the replacement, so might just have been how the first guy played.
Tiffany hasn't gotten much consideration all game and has gotten away with bandwagoning timer after time without any significant questioning or suspicion. I feel that the way they (probably have to) post in that third person manner draws some suspicion away from them, hiding up their prospective scummy identity. However, Tiffany has been digging up dirt on and jumpin on wagons of players who. I view to be on the townies side when looking at my reads of them. Finally, once Hermès got replaced and the game progressed, Tiffany real stood out for trying to be over-towny and keeping with the popular line of play (aka wagoning way too much, as I said earlier).
Vote Tiffany - not that it matters at this point.
Tbh, I misplayed early game with acting cautious, but I am surprised how much you guys emphasized upon it. And later on, most of the things you guys believed were scummy were kind of stretches or not really that scummy, but I digress. You guys will see your fault when I flip town
Valentino wrote:yeah I cant see tiffany scum OR bulgari scum
that entire exchange is town v town imo. Bulgari is suspiciously cool with responses and tiffany is pretty bad to interpreting responses
I would focus on vera and new Hermes once tomorrow starts and maybe Kate spade
Not that it means much, but explain why you can't see Tiffany being scum?