Current date/time is Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:49 am
Search found 102 matches for Hermès
Basic bitches wear that shit so I don't even bother
owait this is not instagram
SORRY I LOVE YOUR MUSIC BUT YOUR COMMENT ABOUT EARLY WAGGONS SOUNDED SORT OF SCUMMY JS.
I STILL HATE KRISTEN STEWART
Anyways, my vote on Valentino is only semi RVS. I was completely serious about that comment sounding scummy. Sorry florence ily.
Armani wrote:Also, wouldn't discussing likely scum tactics possibly deter scum from behaving in that manner? I don't know about you honey, but I think it'd be better if we waited for specific instances of scummy behavior to occur, and then analyze them, instead of discussing it before it actually happens.
Miley does not approve of using the term "honey". MILEY DOES NOT APPROVE.
I do agree though. That's sort of what I meant with my WIFOM comment. Hell, scum could even say shit like "This is how I would play as scum" to deter us from reading them as scum if that dialog continued. WIFOM makes my brain hurt so let's just not go there
Burberry wrote:I dislike Hermes’ apologetic tone when she addresses her vote on Valentino.
I just fucking love Florence Welch's music. That's literally all it was. If you noticed, my vote is still on Valentino.
Marchesa wrote:Also of note is that Shannon Bestie was not playing as noob and if you actually read that game the playstyle was very aggressive and the playstyle evolved once out of RVS and made some of the best posts in that game. if every town member played like fegelein did shannon bestie we'd be in an excellent position
At this point Burberry looks the most obvious town to me
Also Hermes is not disguising himself at all
Disgusing meaning I seem scummy or town. I can read that either way. Also, I AM MIELY SO IT IS *HERSELF JS
Also, Prada, careless is hardly an argument. RVS is kind dead at this point and throwing a vote on me because I am "careless" is really shitty reasoning. I actually have not been careless at all. My vote on Valentino is justified.
I am gonna agree with Marchesa. I am not viewing that playstyle as scummy. Not saying it's immediately town, but assuming that someone is scum based on that is kind of mediocre reasoning. Granted, we don't have much to go on at this point, but still.
VALENTINO 4 LYFE. I still don't like your comment about early bandwagons. Early bandwagons when there is a scumtell is different than just a random bandwagon.
Hermès wrote:VALENTINO 4 LYFE. I still don't like your comment about early bandwagons. Early bandwagons when there is a scumtell is different than just a random bandwagon.
By the way, it's implied that I was saying there wasn't really any scumtells to justify an early bandwagon.
Valentino wrote:lol RVS ended when you slipped and Armani sheeped
I AM INTERESTED TO SEE THIS SLIP. IS IT A SLIPPERY SLIDE. MILEY LIKES SLIDES. I HOPE IT IS A WATERSLIDE.
ALSO WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THE "WHY NOT?" WHEN YOU ASKED KRISTEN FUCKER (insulting actress not player) IF SHE THINKS I AM TOWN OR NOT?
Valentino wrote:70% of the time that list is perfectly accurate
Reads are one thing, saying conf town (and then contradicting yourself by saying it's 70% accurate???) is another. I'm far from stupid. Douchey town is a shitty playstyle so let's just refrain from insulting and being asses please. Don't be a TIWSS.
Sasha Obama hi how r u gurl. How u doin. U r a qt.
Vivienne Westwood wrote:Versace wrote:prod dodge
On behalf of everyone playing, if you are doing this willfully and not because of some restriction, please stop with all the rhymes and shit.
Marchesa wrote:Me and Hermes have expressed vastly different opinions on RVS so it's kind of hard to not be a little biased when it comes to that. The only thing I've seen that I really see as possibly scummy is the complete dismissal of the Dior vote which could be seen as trying to relieve pressure on a partner.
But I don't have a strong read one way or another.
By not following I mean not following the logic. I was actually trying to get someone to give me the reasoning behind it because I had failed to see it.
Prada wrote:I voted Dior back in the RVS. I clearly wasn't going to get a reaction from them though which is why Im now trying someone else.
How's that for a reaction?
Versace wrote:Jimmy Choo wrote:I feel that what the majority of us will do as scum in this situation is more likely what they will be doing...
if i was scum id just prod dodge and not post
That is so fucking scummy. And I'd like to point out that you have not posted any content at all this game, so based on your own reasoning, you are scum.
Dior wrote:On Valentino's post: I must have missed something, what slip did Hermes make?
I still have yet to figure out what the hell he's talking about.
Read on Drake? His lack of activity + recent post seem really scummy to me.
Read on Kristen Stewart?
Read on Valentino?
Miu Miu wrote:I suppose that the Unvote at that point was a bit of a prudent blunder on my behalf; nevertheless, after following two of the more recent NOCs on PO (both of which scum won - being Finchinator/Raducan and Uso/Treecko), there were reckless day 1 reads, actions, and even lynches which ultimately were detrimental towards the town in the long run due to lack of the game developmental period transpiring. Even if the town did catch a scum at this point, who is so adamant to strongly pursue their scum-reads currently and willing to risk a harmful mislynch?
I know, I know, I know - this is all over-cautious and my blatant conservatism is arguably an overreaction and could give you guys the wrong idea on who I am, but I do it at the best interest of the towns' prosperity.
Moreover, I stand by my initial anti-wagon knee-jerk reaction to the vote count I saw as I wasn't fully informed of the contents of the thread at that point due to my busy schedule. Now, I have caught-up a bit and read a fair amount. Needless to say, some people are overthinking the value of minuscule detailed, especially at this point, in my opinions. I advise a more lax analysis of players and such in a game of this quantity and set-up, but you can differentiate in beliefs if you wish. Regardless of personal philosophy, I will remain voteless for now, but keep my eye on the following individuals: Hermés and Versace.
That is all.
Can you explain your reasoning on "keeping your eye on me"? Unless you think early bussing when we are just out of RVS is a valid strategy for mafia (which it is not in the least), pegging both both me and Versace as potential scum is kind of irrational. He's my #1 scumread at the moment and I immediately called him out on his scummy post and voted him. I'd like you to actually give reasoning for your reads rather than just say "you are keeping an eye" on them. That's a huge cop-out and isn't helping your case. It comes across as overcautious scum just like your previous posts have.
SASHA OBAMA WILL YOU ACCEPT MY PROPOSAL? I WANT TO MARRY YOU
Chanel wrote:Miu Miu, the player count for those beginner NOCs are a lot different from large games like this. Keep in mind it takes thirteen to lynch, which is quite a large number. Miu Miu, you yourself have amassed the most votes as of the votecount at the top of this page, but a whopping 10 more votes need to go on you in order for a lynch to happen. I suggest you put your vote somewhere to show that you can not only apply pressure on who you suspect to be scum, but also that you can put your money where your mouth is (think someone in vanilla said that its a good phrase so im copying) and that you are committed to finding scum. Scum will only be outing themselves if they go for the quicklynch at this point in the game
And for those wondering why im such a fucking hypocrite and where my vote is, I'm still reading the thread and should make an informed vote in the next day or so.
Calling Miu Miu's reasoning for being cautious invalid yet taking another day to make an "informed vote" is kind of irrelevant, especially when you gave pressure as a valid reason to vote someone. You don't need to be informed to pressure someone. I realize you admitted that this was hypocritical, but admitting it seems like an attempt to actually divert attention from the fact that you are doing it. It's the same concept as saying "ignore the zit on my face"; openly acknowledging it makes it less significant. I'm reading that as scummy.
Tiffany wrote:Vote Hermes
Miley Cyrus, get back to your wrecking ball!
This is no longer RVS. Please actually give some reasoning for your votes. We can't get anywhere if people don't actually put content in their posts.
Miu Miu wrote:Heremés has just been voting around and trying to hear everyone's reads and start a potential wagon as of late. Might just be an aggressive town, but could be a scum trying to screw with everyone.
How the hell is getting reads from people scummy. Reads are so vital. When scum is lynched, their reads can be examined along with their interactions to find partners, never mind that it stimulates discussion and progresses the game. Vote on Kristin was RVS, no need to justify that. Vote on Valentino was justified. Wanted to put a bit of pressure on her after that post about wanting an early bandwagon, and her response hasn't given me a strong read either way. Vote on Drake (fuck the fashion aliases) is completely legit. He practically claimed scum. I'm not "trying to start a potential wagon" to screw with people, I'm placing my vote on a scumread. The argument "could be scum trying to screw with everyone" could literally be applied to every single person playing. It's completely arbitrary.
As bad as your reasoning on me is, you haven't backed it up with a vote. Disappointing. We aren't going to get anywhere with BS reasoning and no voting.