Search found 64 matches for Versace

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

confirming

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

prod dodge

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Jimmy Choo wrote:I feel that what the majority of us will do as scum in this situation is more likely what they will be doing...

if i was scum id just prod dodge and not post

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

i havent read everything

Hermès wrote:

Valentino wrote:70% of the time that list is perfectly accurate

Reads are one thing, saying conf town (and then contradicting yourself by saying it's 70% accurate???) is another. I'm far from stupid. Douchey town is a shitty playstyle so let's just refrain from insulting and being asses please. Don't be a TIWSS.

Sasha Obama hi how r u gurl. How u doin. U r a qt.

is this a town read?

jimmy is new
vivienne is hard to read, antitown but not scummy
valentino is just blaine in set 1 but it looks scummy
^dior votes were weird
hermes is bad but prob town
miu is scummy but i need to read more
no idea on marchesa or burberry yet, rest are inactive

this game is nsfw

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

two of you didnt get that my third post was a joke smh

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Lucifer wrote:grab

dat ass

i agree with hermes, townreading me is an overreaction

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

but my post was a joke, i didnt mean to play around with my "suspicion" seriously

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Bulgari wrote:

Versace wrote:vote prada

Explain?

prada posted this logic for his votes, got called out by dior, and never came back. its been a while and he seems scummy and not in an inexperienced town way

chanel:

tiffany only little girls use third person for themselves. audrey hepburn was a classy lady.

i dont like fendi but im not seeing a real case on armani

town/scum/null:

Spoiler:

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

"slight maybe" = "slight town maybe"

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

mad

Hermès wrote:I swear I'm sober right now.

thats the problem

Dior wrote:Oh wow, realised that should've said page 9, my bad. But I looked again and decided this was a really weird reaction to have, why so defensive about it?

no that wasnt scum from jimmy, thought i wasnt taking him seriously

Burberry wrote:Versace I can follow most of your reads list but I don't understand the scum read on Louis Vuitton.

he wants to vote miu but cant think of a real reason (was louis the one where i put the link?)

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

i was going to post something but i need to read that

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

i also forgot what it was a page or two ago

i cannot read this post or anything tiffany posts and feel good about them, diors reads are weird (hypocrisy is good?) but i still think hes town

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

vote vote vote

i see hermes agrees on dior reads
and likes my junk

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

hermes what happened to louis being scum?

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

oh right kanye lol

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Fuck it, I'm not posting in lowercase anymore. It pisses me off.

Which tiny post?

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Oh you're being ironic, aren't you.

I'm glad he actually pointed out what was wrong with this post (the hypocrisy) unlike a lot of people who commented on it.

To those implicitly comparing it with Ortheore in Vanilla: he was town.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I just linked to fendi's post

I meant this one

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Also: I'm not speculating/commenting/confirming/denying on aliases to anyone but myself.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

@Burberry: I don't think so if you've actually been on the fence about it. But it's hard to tell if he was in that instance because of the way he said it so directly in this post.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I don't have time to say anything substantial but I encourage you to compare Louis's post to my post.

Tiffany, there is a difference between believing that Jimmy believed his own argument and believing his argument. The question mark read is bollocks.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Oh, hi Jimmy.

I really think it is.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I haven't read anything since my last post, except to check that nobody hammered anybody yet. What I wanted to post was something like this:

I should apologize to Jimmy for being rude to him without acknowledging the points he makes. Sometimes I can't understand them and forget to ask him to clarify his posts, but sometimes it's because (as I am about to explain) I think he is being taken advantage of by scum who want his arguments to look better than they are. He could be on a different scum team, but personally I don't think so. I suppose he could even be a partner, but I also find that unlikely.

Thanks in part to Hermes's huge post opening my eyes to it, I have become pretty convinced that Tiffany, Louis, and Prada are on a scum team together.

Tiffany & Louis: His first post about her seemed odd to me at the time, but I didn't realize the implication until later. He said here that Tiffany was a bad vote because people were mistaking a post condition (whether real or fake) with scumminess, but then went a step further and said it actually implied she was town. Hermes noted the chainsawing in this post, and I agree with that interpretation. This actually began a crusade of fallacious posts against Bulgari at that point (accusing him of hypocritically fence-sitting when he did not), and I believe this is where the entire spat about Jimmy's posts came in. I am fairly sure that Tiffany is scum trying to take advantage of a new town player, one whose posts are frankly often difficult to understand, to distract us from the fact that her vote was just a chainsaw defense.

Tiffany & Fendi: Fendi hasn't posted very much, but after his first vote in the game Burberry made a post about how his reasoning seemed "artificial." I thought he meant that Fendi's post seemed like scum trying to vote town, but considering how quickly Fendi moved to get his vote off (compare this post to this post, made within a few hours of each other) I think it's more that he was bussing a partner but didn't want a wagon. Tiffany hasn't talked much about him, and since no one has voted Tiffany it's difficult to look for defense on her part. Note that Fendi is currently setting up a dichotomy between Vera and Miu after Tiffany and he have supported a lynch on Miu. I think this is because Miu is not on his team, so he thinks Miu is town. This also explains why he is suddenly interested in unvoting Miu and doing an ISO on Tiffany. He expects Miu (who could be on another scum team) to flip town and wants to distance somewhat from Miu's last scum read. I see that he still has not done the ISO, so I won't say what I expect his final read to be, but I'll see after it happens.

Louis & Fendi: I thought Louis's reads were similar in style and content to my reads, and one of the exceptions was that Fendi was null. It would be helpful if either of these two had posted more.

All three have tried to distance themselves from the Miu lynch while pledging support. Two of them unvoted some time ago, and the third has decided not to post anymore, which is a way to say "It's out of my hands." She also said Miu was not a great lynch a few pages before voting him.

I don't know if I want to change my vote in light of this. My gut reads Prada and Miu as scum. The evidence to support them as partners is weak: Prada's first vote was on the only person who voted Miu and Miu made a post against Prada but it didn't lead to anything. It seems like Miu is the only person likely to be lynched at this point other than my town read Hermes, so I can always vote him. Maybe I should read the rest of the thread first.

A general note on false dichotomy: The main offenders are Tiffany and Fendi, both of whom are probably scum, but it's important for everyone to know that the mere fact that two people are arguing does not mean much about their alignments. Even if each genuinely wants the other to be lynched, they could both be town, or be on two different scum teams since this is a closed setup. One person defending another openly enough also may mean they are probably not partners, but as before they could both be town or be on different scum teams. Not to mention you could just be wrong. "They can't both be town" is an easy way to turn one mislynch into two, while "They can't both be scum" is an easy way to save one partner after another partner is lynched.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

no one has voted Fendi*