Search found 38 matches for Louis Vuitton

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

confirmm

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

vote Prada
i hate meryl streep

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Hello boys and girls. Just caught up with the four pages of RVS! Really you guys let that go on for so long. Shame on you.

I really don't like Miu Miu trying to put things off and get to this later. I'm of the opinion if you have nothing to contribute then it's better not to post than to make useless fluff posts that don't have any meat on them. So far she hasn't posted anything remotely useful and is striking me as either very uninterested or a scum trying to get by with post that have no substance.

Vote Miu Miu

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I got a complete null read on Versace. I don't think you can justify him being definite scum or definite village after how little he has posted. Sure he made the sarcastic post, but I think that could be made by someone of either alignment and there is not enough to go on with regards to him.

I'm starting to think that Miu Miu might be new to this as opposed to scummy, but I definitely still have my eye on here.

Unvote

Now with regards to where my vote is going next.

Vote Ray-ban

I feel like he has been a bit under the radar so far this game and would like to here a few more opinions from him.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Ray-ban I wanted you to post something of some substance not just complain about not knowing how to Iso someone. You also put off Dior's question asking you your opinions on the game so far. So I'll ask it again. What are your opinions on the game so far Ray-ban?

I'm agreeing with Valentino that a Miu Miu vote might be our best course of action at this point. No one has given me overwhelming scum vibes, and even though I think Miu Miu might be just new to mafia, the fact that she has made so many slip ups is just rubbing me the wrong way.

I don't think that Tiffany is a great vote. I would like her to go back and read the first 7 pages as it would be useful, but I think some people are mistaking a weird posting style for scumminess. I have been in multiple games in the past where people used weird posting styles, and as far as I can remember, they almost always flipped Town, so I'm not going to be going after her until I see some real reason to.

I'm leaving my vote on Ray-ban for now, but considering switching it back to Miu Miu.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Bulgari wrote:Burberry, regardless of what he thinks of Ray at the moment, that doesn't excuse writing the line "voting miu miu may be our best course of action" and then subsequently not following up on it. It's fence sitting and clearly a tell that Louis is being cautious with how he places his vote.

There is plenty of time for me to change my vote on Miu Miu, but I'm getting stronger scum vibes from Ray-ban so I left my vote on him. Most people don't seem to agree with me on that so thats why I mentioned that we might need to consolidate on a different vote. I don't think it's fence sitting to vote your top scum read :/

@ Ray-ban the reason I voted you as opposed to some people with less activity is that I felt you would at least respond to a vote on you, and since you have posted twice that you are going to do Iso's and figure out some reads. So far you haven't done that and have just put it off. Maybe once you do my opinion will change, but I don't like your response to my vote.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

No need to prod me, I"m here. Reading through the stuff I missed and I'll post something more substantial in a few minutes.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Alexander McQueen(null): He doesn't have a very large amount of content and their wasn't enough to get a read on him either way looking at his ISO.
Armani(scummy): I don't like how he has only focused on one post by Valentino in RVS. I get that the post is slightly scummy, but he has not developed his argument at all and all his posts are just rehashes of his original argument. Also once Chanel says that she likes the way he responded to her accusations Armani drops completely off the map. I don't like that at all.
Bulgari(town): I like her posts and she seems to have a firm grasp on the game. Nothing in her posts seem to give me any bad vibes, so I am getting a town lean from her.
Burberry(town): Another player whose posts seemed logicial and when I iso'd them, nothing popped up to give me any bad feelings about them.
Chanel(town): A town read again. I like how Chanel has been scum hunting and trying to get people to provide justifications for their actions.
Dior(town): Solid posts the whole time and has put a lot of effort into moving the town forward.
Fendi(null): Outside of the one long post about Miu Miu and Vera Wang she hasn't posted much. I do look forward to her iso of Tiffany as it should give us a bit more to go off of with regards to her posting.
Givenchy(inactive): nothing to go off of
Gucci(inactive): nothing of substance posted
Hermes(null): Hermes is interesting. The first player on the account striked me as a bit off, but I think the second player has done a good job of reversing that and I have them at a null read for now.

There are some of my reads. I'll finish isoing everyone a bit later. I've been doing this for over an hour and need a break.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I think you are trying to make a lot more out of us both copying the playerlist from the OP than is actually there. Of course our reads are going to look similar in style even if they differ in about 3 players out of 10, with most of the ones that are the same being mainly universal reads currently in the game.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Jimmy Choo(town): He has made solid points and seems to be twon aligned.
Kate Spade(inactive): Has not posted enough to get a read either way.
Marchesa(null): I dont like her fluff posts with Tiffany in the middle that derailed the thread a bit. Beside that she has posted some good things, but I'm not willing to put her as a full town read yet, as I we are still waiting for her promised read through that she hasn't posted in almost two days.
Miu Miu(scum): This has been hashed and rehashed a ton, and I see her as the most likely vote for day 1.
Prada(inactive): She has 1 post longer than 2 lines and really hasn't contributed anything to this game.
Ray-Ban(scum): I don't like how he responded to mine and others questions this game and he seems to be trying to avoid the spotlight as best as possible. He also made a promise to take a look at people on the main wagon and do some analysis, but instead of doing that just threw a post on Miu Miu and sulked away from posting any content.
Tiffany(town): Just over the course of the game she has always seemed town to me. I don't have the time to do a full read through of all her posts, but that has been my gut feeling this whole time.
Valentino(town): She has had some nice posts and im getting a town vibe from her.
Vera Wang(scum): Her outburst last night was odd to the say the least. I think this definitely merits a closer eye in the proceeding day.
Versace(town): I don't like how he decided to consider us both using the same playerlist from the OP as scummy, but besides that his posts have been relatively solid and easy to understand.
Vivienne Westwood(town): If you look past the rhyming I think her posts have brought up a few good points and I have as a town read for now.
Yves Saint Laurent(inactive): ...
Zara(another inactive): ...!

unvote Ray-ban
Vote Miu Miu

With the deadline quickly approaching we need to make a lynch and this seems like the best option all things considered.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

How do you feel about how the vote went down yesterday?

What is your opinion on Tiffany?

Who are your scum reads right now?

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Ray-Ban wrote:“He could be serious, but then he doesn't follow up on it later so I don't think that's feasible...?”
 I was doing that early as I didn’t really have any reads at that point so felt like trying to pressure someone. When I had a better idea I picked someone else to vote.

VOTE: TIFFANY

I will look for reasons they're scum later.

So you are just voting them without having any reasons why they are scum...

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Alexander McQueen wrote:

Louis Vuitton wrote:

Ray-Ban wrote:“He could be serious, but then he doesn't follow up on it later so I don't think that's feasible...?”
 I was doing that early as I didn’t really have any reads at that point so felt like trying to pressure someone. When I had a better idea I picked someone else to vote.

VOTE: TIFFANY

I will look for reasons they're scum later.

So you are just voting them without having any reasons why they are scum...

Louis Vuitton wrote:Vote Armani

Isn't that exacly what you did too???

No, I posted my read on Armani and said why I thought he was scummy. "Armani(scummy): I don't like how he has only focused on one post by Valentino in RVS. I get that the post is slightly scummy, but he has not developed his argument at all and all his posts are just rehashes of his original argument. Also once Chanel says that she likes the way he responded to her accusations Armani drops completely off the map. I don't like that at all." What Ray-ban is doing is completely different. He is posting a vote on someone and then going back and rereading posts specifically looking for things that can justify the vote after the fact. This is much worse than looking at someone with an objective viewpoint and once you finish analyzing everything, coming to the conclusion that they are scummy. If you do the former you are bound to find stuff to support your predetermined conclusion, and it's a backwards way to scum hunt that doesn't produce organic results.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Alexander McQueen = Null. | Null
Armani = Null. | Null
Bulgari = Scummy Town.
Burberry = Town. | Town
Chanel = Town. | Null Slight Town
Dior = Scummy Null.
Fendi = Town. | Slight Scum
Givenchy = Town. | Null, inactive
Gucci = Shithead with no clue. | Null, inactive
Hermès = Nully Town. | Reckless/agressive town
Jimmy Choo = Town I guess. | Leaning scum
Kate Spade = Eh, unsure here - will say town. | Null, inactive
Louis Vuitton = Town. | Leaning scum
Marchesa = Scum. | Null?
Miu Miu = Town. | Scum
Prada = Townish. | Null/Sligh scum
Ray-Ban = Town. | Null
Tiffany = Scum. | scum
Valentino = Town. | No read
Vera Wang = Bad Town. | No read
Versace = Town. | No read
Vivienne Westwood = Scummy Null. | Town
Yves Saint Laurent = Null. | No read
Zara = Town I guess. | No read

If you put Miu Miu(left) and Dior's(right) reads side by side they don't have a ton in common and in fact are extremely different. They don't agree on any scum reads and most people that one calls scum the other calls town.

@Kate Spade I made that question intentionally vague. You can take it however you want.

Personally I felt like yesterday was a foregone conclusion most of the time, with the lynch slower strolling towards a Miu Miu verdict and most people not agreeing on a second viable lynch target that could get close to enough votes to equal the Miu Miu wagon.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Versace wrote:
Louis's actions look to me to confirm what I said about him. Someone votes Tiffany and the Louis takes the first chance he gets to hop on him. I'm not as sure about Fendi, whom I would expect to bus Tiffany all the way to a lynch at this point if they are really scum partners. It would make his scum read look softer in retrospect, though.

???

I did not take the first chance I could get to jump on Ray-ban. He was my top scum read all last game and he made an extremely awful post. Multiple other people have also pointed out how horrible his post was where he voted Tiffany. Three other people had voted Tiffany that day before Ray-ban and I didn't jump on any of them, because they didn't make extremely stupid posts. When someone says, "I'm voting for someone without a reason. I'll find one later", you can't just let that go. It had nothing to do with the fact that he voted Tiffany and everything to do with the fact that he made an extremely stupid post.

Now about Tiffany. She has dropped off the face of the planet today which is very odd considering her activity yesterday. This is causing her to shoot up my scum list and I definitely think something is up with her.

unvote
Vote Tiffany

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Weak scum at the moment. I still don't like Armani and Ray-ban, but considering how Ray-ban has been hinting at claiming, I think we should give him the benefit of the doubt for now and focus on Tiff who has dropped off the face of the planet.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I wanted to focus on Armani more at the start of the day since the previous day more people agreed with my Armani read and I figured we could go after him more easily at the start of the day today.

I was going back and fourth in my head about whether or not to switch my vote to Ray-ban and I decided it would be best to live my vote on Armani to pressure him and pressure Ray-ban through my posts, therefore getting two birds with one stone. Although, once others started harping on Ray-ban as well I saw that we could increase the pressure on him even higher by switching my vote over from Armani to Ray-ban as that was the better path to follow at the moment.

My gut read yesterday was based on how active Tiffany was and how willing she seemed to be to participate in the game. Since that has changed today and she is no where to be seen my read has also changed. As I don't like her disappearing once others started pressuring her when she was so active previously.

The reason I switched my vote over is to try and pressure Tiff to get back to the game and because of the way Ray-ban voted and made his follow up post once people started to pressure him it seem like he had an inspect result or something else incriminating on Tiff.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Sorry my play was really bad yesterday. I think I was overthinking everything too much with Ray-ban's crumb claim. I looked through his posts and don't see anything that could be a crumb. No excuse for how I played.

unvote
Vote Ray-ban

Puts him at 9. Let's not go further for now.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

There is nothing wrong with a  

Should be interesting to see what Armani's sub says  

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

I feel like Ray-ban is trying to force a claim out of Tiff now that he got caught.

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Im not buying Ray's claim at all and I think he is the best target for today.

Do you guys have any questions for me so I can alleviate some of the desire for my lynch?

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

Ray-Ban wrote:
Valentino is something that should die tomorrow.

Am I the only one really confused by this? Is he saying he is going to kill Valentino?

FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

k bby <3