FASHIONABLE NOC ANON MAFIA - Days 1, 2, 3.1

yeah if vig is in game it should be on kate

i vote scum? who is scum? tiffany is scum?

vote tiffany

vote Ray-Ban

>votes with wagon
>will find reasons why she's scum later

yeah that's not gonna fly here.
I did an ISO and your vote on Tiffany lacked reasoning too
Ray-ban, who do you find strikes you as most obvious scum? And why did you pre-emptively follow the wagon without knowing the motivation behind it? Can you provide some reads for us just so we can see your thought process behind some of the stuff you've done?

Failure to comply and I will leave my vote on you

fos on Armani and Miss WANG (Lynch All Lurkers imo)
i will probably look into Kate, Jimmy Choo, and Givenchy later

also tiffany's activity seems to have dropped significantly since her wagon began to formulate

just felt like i needed to point that out, though i don't know what to make of it (possibly lurking scum?)

Tiffany is here! Tiffany occasionally has days with no access to internet (see: Tiffany before deadline was away for 2+days?), Tiffany strongly dislikes how other players claim that Tiffany has 'dropped off the face of the planet' when Tiffany had just responded to Hermes a few pages ago! Sounds like another excuse to get on the flash wagon!

Tiffany sees that Ray ban has made the second worst posts in the game, the worst post was Fendis initial vote on Tiffany!

'Vote for Tiffany and look for reasons why they are scum later!'

Tiffany cannot comprehend this level of bad

Tiffany also feels that Ray ban's idea of a crumb, is also bullocks! Tiffany cannot see why some players actually take it for granted( except for scum who are willing to hop on the wagon) when 1) he could be joking 2) he did not refer to anything in particular 3) he did not crumb at all at any point in the game 4) he could be referring to someone else


Those who take this WIFOM idea at face value should be suspected! And Ray ban should be lynched!

vote ray ban

Ray-Ban wrote:“He could be serious, but then he doesn't follow up on it later so I don't think that's feasible...?”
I was doing that early as I didn’t really have any reads at that point so felt like trying to pressure someone. When I had a better idea I picked someone else to vote.

VOTE: TIFFANY

I will look for reasons they're scum later.

Ray-Ban wrote:"Trolling or?"
Nah just people can't pick up on crumbs.

I will look at people voting me for scum.

wtf

Unvote
Vote Ray-Ban

Those posts were simply the straw that broke the camel's back! Mainly, his general lucky attitude and opportunistic voting pattern(see his vote on Miu Miu)is generally enough to warrant a universal scumread, if not a lynch. Those two above posts just tip over the barrel!

Miu wasn't scum, but Ray ban definitely is! If ray ban flips town Tiffany will eat a phone book

*lurky not lucky

Tiffany why exactly do you think I am scummy. I justified why I voted you pretty well.

8-6, try not to get either past 9 until we know what's going on or Ray fails to post for sufficiently long (I do expect him to come explain himself properly)

Versace wrote:8-6, try not to get either past 9 until we know what's going on or Ray fails to post for sufficiently long (I do expect him to come explain himself properly)

only thing i expect from him is a claim because his post already explains that he clearly wagon hopped towards tiff and that scum motive drove his claim in panic

he claims and actual pr cc's = lynch

Then he is using this opportunity to lure a PR? This PR will get night killed!

But have no fear, Tiffany will protect you~

Fendi wrote:Tiffany why exactly do you think I am scummy. I justified why I voted you pretty well.

Most because your justification comes after the wagon. If you have justified your reasonings BEFORE anybody caught in to it, Tiffany would have believed you immediately. But what you done with Miu and Tiffany, just seems like you're copying others points then using them as your own. And then pretend to seem helpful.

Which is still better than Ray ban with no reasoning at all


Also, Tiffany needs to know: was Fendi replaced at any point of the game? This is very important!

Tiffany wrote:

Fendi wrote:Tiffany why exactly do you think I am scummy. I justified why I voted you pretty well.

Most because your justification comes after the wagon. If you have justified your reasonings BEFORE anybody caught in to it, Tiffany would have believed you immediately. But what you done with Miu and Tiffany, just seems like you're copying others points then using them as your own. And then pretend to seem helpful.

Which is still better than Ray ban with no reasoning at all


Also, Tiffany needs to know: was Fendi replaced at any point of the game? This is very important!

You copy other peoples points and use them on your own all the time. Also, I'd say about 60% of my reads on you and Miu Miu was brand new content. The rest was just scummy stuff that other people saw before me. I don't have access to my computer at all times, I can't really help it that other people said it first.

Also, other people aren't going in and directly dissecting posts like I am, so I don't see how this is wagoning. In addition, I already said I could have voted Hermes instead of Miu Miu and possibly swung the wagon the other way. Also, you just said my post was the 1st scummiest post, but now Ray Ban is more scummy than me?

Speaking of Hermes

Tiffany what do you think about my read on Jimmy Choo?

Yeah because your current new posts are better.

If you're town why don't you give us an analysis of Ray ban now if you have access to a computer? And then vote him if you find him scummy of course.

Okay I'll do tht today after school.

Sorry my play was really bad yesterday. I think I was overthinking everything too much with Ray-ban's crumb claim. I looked through his posts and don't see anything that could be a crumb. No excuse for how I played.

unvote
Vote Ray-ban

Puts him at 9. Let's not go further for now.

I honestly dont see what makes him more scummy than any of the inactives like Vivienne, Chanel, and Vera.

Isn't it already highlighted multiple times for you, Fendi?

Prada wrote:

Ray-Ban wrote:“He could be serious, but then he doesn't follow up on it later so I don't think that's feasible...?”
I was doing that early as I didn’t really have any reads at that point so felt like trying to pressure someone. When I had a better idea I picked someone else to vote.

VOTE: TIFFANY

I will look for reasons they're scum later.

Ray-Ban wrote:"Trolling or?"
Nah just people can't pick up on crumbs.

I will look at people voting me for scum.

wtf

Unvote
Vote Ray-Ban

Louis Vuitton wrote:Sorry my play was really bad yesterday.  I think I was overthinking everything too much with Ray-ban's crumb claim.  I looked through his posts and don't see anything that could be a crumb. No excuse for how I played.

unvote
Vote Ray-ban

Puts him at 9.  Let's not go further for now.

7-7, I meant Tiffany ( vs Ray (6)

This reminds me of something I said before I started being stupid and supporting mislynches

Versace wrote:

miu is scummy but i need to read more explain

fits cautious scum and not a bad lynch, but maybe too well. its wifom but thats a dumb thing to do as scum in a game this big. i need to see more from miu to make a good read. the post about keeping on eye on me wasnt great but playing cautious with 25 players is extreme even for bad scum

that's supposed to be an 8 and a ) not a